RIGHTS? OR PREVILIGES?
IS THERE A GAY AGENDA?
Homosexual activists often scoff at the idea that a "gay agenda" exists. Please read the following and decide
In February 1972 the National Coalition of Gay Organizations met at the Armitage Avenue United Methodist Church in Chicago.
An invitation had been sent out to 495 homosexual organizations across the U.S. to come and prepare a "gay stance for
the 1972 elections."
About 200 individuals from 18 states representing 85 organizations showed up for the two-day event. Conference participants
adopted the 1972 Gay Rights Platform, which included 17 federal and state "demands."
1. Amend all federal Civil Rights Acts, other legislation and government controls to prohibit discrimination in employment,
housing, public accommodations and public services.
2. Issuance by the President of an executive order prohibiting the military from excluding for reasons of their sexual
orientation, persons who of their own volition desire entrance into the Armed Services; and from issuing less-than-fully-honorable
discharges from homosexuality; and the upgrading to fully honorable all such discharges previously issued, with retroactive
3. Issuance by the President of an executive order prohibiting discrimination in the federal civil service because of
sexual orientation, in hiring and promoting; and prohibiting discriminations against homosexuals in security clearances.
4. Elimination of tax inequities victimizing single persons and same-sex couples.
5. Elimination of bars to the entry, immigration and naturalization of homosexual aliens.
6. Federal encouragement and support for sex education courses, prepared and taught by Gay women and men, presenting homosexuality
as a valid, healthy preference and lifestyle as a viable alternative to heterosexuality.
7. Appropriate executive orders, regulations and legislation banning the compiling, maintenance and dissemination of information
on an individual's sexual preferences, behavior, and social and political activities for dossiers and data banks.
8. Federal funding of aid programs of Gay men's and women's organizations designed to alleviate the problems encountered
by Gay women and men which are engendered by an oppressive sexist society.
9. Immediate release of all Gay women and men now incarcerated in detention centers, prisons and mental institutions because
of sexual offense charges relating to victimless crimes or sexual orientation; and that adequate compensation be made for
the physical and mental duress encountered; and that all existing records relating to the incarceration be immediately expunged.
1. All federal legislation and programs enumerated in Demands 1, 6, 7, 8 and 9 above should be implemented at the State
level where applicable.
2. Repeal of all state laws prohibiting private sexual acts involving consenting persons; equalization for homosexuals
and heterosexuals for the enforcement of all laws.
3. Repeal all state laws prohibiting solicitation for private voluntary sexual liaisons; and laws prohibiting prostitution,
both male and female.
4. Enactment of legislation prohibiting insurance companies and other state-regulated enterprises from discriminating
because of sexual orientation, in insurance and in bonding or any other prerequisite to employment or control of one's personal
5. Enactment of legislation so that child custody, adoption, visitation rights, foster parenting, and the like shall not
be denied because of sexual orientation or marital status.
6. Repeal of all laws prohibiting transvestism and cross-dressing.
7. Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent.
8. Repeal of all legislative provisions that restrict the sex or number of persons entering into a marriage unit; and
the extension of legal benefits to all persons who cohabit regardless of sex or numbers.
(The source of the information above is by Laud Humphreys, "Out of the Closets...The Sociology of Homosexual Liberation",
Prentice Hall: 1972, p.165)
"The greatest single victory of the gay movement over the past decade has been to shift the debate from behavior
to identity, thus forcing opponents into a position where they can be seen as attacking the civil rights of homosexual citizens."
From The Homosexualization of America,
by homosexual activist Dennis Altman.
STRATEGIES OF THE HOMOSEXUAL MOVEMENT
(The following article called "The Overhauling of Straight America'' was written by Marshall K. Kirk and Erastes
Pill and appeared in Guide Magazine, November 1987. As you read the article, keep in how long ago the article was first published.
Many of the strategies have already been put into place and have achieved their desired results. A friend of mine who recently
read this article commented, "They got me! I fell for it. I can't believe they suckered me in for so many years!"
The first order of business is desensitization of the American public concerning gays and gay rights. To desensitize the
public is to help it view homosexuality with indifference instead of with keen emotion. Ideally, we would have straights register
differences in sexual preference the way they register different tastes for ice cream or sports games: she likes strawberry
and I like vanilla; he follows baseball and I follow football. No big deal.
At least in the beginning, we are seeking public desensitization and nothing more. We do not need and cannot expect a
full "appreciation" or "understanding" of homosexuality from the average American. You can forget about
trying to persuade the masses that homosexuality is a good thing. But if only you can get them to think that it is just another
thing, with a shrug of their shoulders, then your battle for legal and social rights is virtually won. And to get to shoulder-shrug
stage, gays as a class must cease to appear mysterious, alien, loathsome and contrary. A large-scale media campaign will be
required in order to change the image of gays in America. And any campaign to accomplish this turnaround should do six things.
 TALK ABOUT GAYS AND GAYNESS AS LOUDLY AND AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE.
The principle behind this advice is simple: almost any behavior begins to look normal if you are exposed to enough of
it at close quarters and among your acquaintances. The acceptability of the new behavior will ultimately hinge on the number
of one's fellows doing it or accepting it. One may be offended by its novelty at first--many, in times past, were momentarily
scandalized by "streaking,'' eating goldfish, and premarital sex. But as long as Joe Six-pack feels little pressure to
perform likewise, and as long as the behavior in question presents little threat to his physical and financial security, he
soon gets used to it and life goes on. The skeptic may still shake his head and think "people arc crazy these days,"
but over time his objections are likely to become more reflective, more philosophical, less emotional.
The way to benumb raw sensitivities about homosexuality is to have a lot of people talk a great deal about the subject
in a neutral or supportive way. Open and frank talk makes the subject seem less furtive, alien, and sinful, more above-board.
Constant talk builds the impression that public opinion is at least divided on the subject, and that a sizable segment accepts
or even practices homosexuality. Even rancorous debates between opponents and defenders serve the purpose of desensitization
so long as "respectable" gays are front and center to make their own pitch. The main thing is to talk about gayness
until the issue becomes thoroughly tiresome.
And when we say talk about homosexuality, we mean just that. In the early stages of any campaign to reach straight America,
the masses should not be shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexual behavior itself. Instead, the imagery of
sex should be downplayed and gay rights should be reduced to an abstract social question as much as possible. First let the
camel get his nose inside the tent--only later his unsightly derriere!
Where we talk is important. The visual media, film and television, are plainly the most powerful image-makers in Western
civilization. The average American household watches over seven hours of TV daily. Those hours open up a gateway into the
private world of straights, through which a Trojan horse might be passed. As far as desensitization is concerned, the medium
is the message--of normalcy. So far, gay Hollywood has provided our best covert weapon in the battle to desensitize the mainstream.
Bit by bit over the past ten years, gay characters and gay themes have been introduced into TV programs and films (though
often this has been done to achieve comedic and ridiculous affects). On the whole the impact has been encouraging. The prime-time
presentation of Consenting Adults on a major network in 1985 is but one high-water mark in favorable media exposure of gay
issues. But this should be just the beginning of a major publicity blitz by gay America.
Would a desensitizing campaign of open and sustained talk about gay issues reach every rabid opponent of homosexuality?
Of course not. While public opinion is one primary source of mainstream values, religious authority is the other. When conservative
churches condemn gays, there are only two things we can do to confound the homophobia of true believers. First, we can use
talk to muddy the moral waters. This means publicizing support for gays by more moderate churches, raising theological objections
of our own about conservative interpretations of biblical teachings, and exposing hatred and inconsistency. Second, we can
undermine the moral authority of homophobic churches by portraying them as antiquated backwaters, badly out of step with the
times and with the latest findings of psychology. Against the mighty pull of institutional Religion one must set the mightier
draw of Science & Public Opinion (the shield and sword of that accursed "secular humanism"). Such an unholy
alliance has worked well against churches before, on such topics as divorce and abortion. With enough open talk about the
prevalence and acceptability of homosexuality, that alliance can work again here.
 PORTRAY GAYS AS VICTIMS, NOT AS AGGRESSIVE CHALLENGERS.
In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined
by reflex to assume the role of protector. If gays are presented, instead, as a strong and prideful tribe promoting a rigidly
nonconformist and deviant lifestyle, they are more likely to be seen as a public menace that justifies resistance and oppression.
For that reason, we must forego the temptation to strut our "gay pride" publicly when it conflicts with the Gay
Victim image. And we must walk the fine line between impressing straights with our great numbers, on the one hand, and sparking
their hostile paranoia-"They are all around us!"--on the other.
A media campaign to promote the Gay Victim image should make use of symbols which reduce the mainstream's sense of threat,
which lower it's guard, and which enhance the plausibility of victimization. In practical terms, this means that jaunty mustachioed
musclemen would keep very low profile in gay commercials and other public presentations, while sympathetic figures of nice
young people, old people, and attractive women would be featured. (It almost goes without saying that groups on the farthest
margin of acceptability such as NAMBLA, [Ed note -- North American Man-Boy Love Association] must play no part at all in such
a campaign: suspected child-molesters will never look like victims.)
Now, there are two different messages about the Gay Victim that are worth communicating. First, the mainstream should
be told that gays are victims of fate, in the sense that most never had a choice to accept or reject their sexual preference.
The message must read: "As far as gays can tell, they were born gay, just as you were born heterosexual or white or black
or bright or athletic. Nobody ever tricked or seduced them; they never made a choice, and are not morally blameworthy. What
they do isn't willfully contrary - it's only natural for them. This twist of fate could as easily have happened to you!"
Straight viewers must be able to identify with gays as victims. Mr. and Mrs. Public must be given no extra excuses to
say, "they are not like us." To this end, the persons featured in the public campaign should be decent and upright,
appealing and admirable by straight standards, completely unexceptionable in appearance--in a word, they should be indistinguishable
from the straights we would like to reach. (To return to the terms we have used in previous articles, spokesmen for our cause
must be R-type "straight gays" rather than Q-type "homosexuals on display.") Only under such conditions
will the message be read correctly: "These folks are victims of a fate that could have happened to me."
By the way, we realize that many gays will question an advertising technique, which might threaten to make homosexuality
look like some dreadful disease, which strikes fated "victims". But the plain fact is that the gay community is
weak and must manipulate the powers of the weak, including the play for sympathy. In any case, we compensate for the negative
aspect of this gay victim appeal under Principle 4. (Below)
The second message would portray gays as victims of society. The straight majority does not recognize the suffering it
brings to the lives of gays and must be shown: graphic pictures of brutalized gays; dramatizations of job and housing insecurity,
loss of child custody, and public humiliation: and the dismal list goes on.
"... In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights
will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector."
 GIVE PROTECTORS A JUST CAUSE.
A media campaign that casts gays as society's victims and encourages straights to be their protectors must make it easier
for those to respond to assert and explain their new protectiveness. Few straight women, and even fewer straight men, will
want to defend homosexuality boldly as such. Most would rather attach their awakened protective impulse to some principle
of justice or law, to some general desire for consistent and fair treatment in society. Our campaign should not demand direct
support for homosexual practices, should instead take anti-discrimination as its theme. The right to free speech, freedom
of beliefs, freedom of association, due process and equal protection of laws-these should be the concerns brought to mind
by our campaign.
It is especially important for the gay movement to hitch its cause to accepted standards of law and justice because its
straight supporters must have at hand a cogent reply to the moral arguments of its enemies. The homophobes clothe their emotional
revulsion in the daunting robes of religious dogma, so defenders of gay rights must be ready to counter dogma with principle.
 MAKE GAYS LOOK GOOD.
In order to make a Gay Victim sympathetic to straights you have to portray him as Everyman. But an additional theme of
the campaign should be more aggressive and upbeat: to offset the increasingly bad press that these times have brought to homosexual
men and women, the campaign should paint gays as superior pillars of society. Yes, yes, we know--this trick is so old it creaks.
Other minorities use it all the time in ads that announce proudly, "Did you know that this Great Man (or Woman) was _________?"
But the message is vital for all those straights who still picture gays as "queer" people-- shadowy, lonesome, fail,
drunken, suicidal, child-snatching misfits.
The honor roll of prominent gay or bisexual men and women is truly eyepopping. From Socrates to Shakespeare, from Alexander
the Great to Alexander Hamilton, from Michelangelo to Walt Whitman, from Sappho to Gertrude Stein, the list is old hat to
us but shocking news to heterosexual America. In no time, a skillful and clever media campaign could have the gay community
looking like the veritable fairy godmother to Western Civilization.
Along the same lines, we shouldn't overlook the Celebrity Endorsement. The celebrities can be straight (God bless you,
Ed Asner, wherever you are) or gay.
 MAKE THE VICTIMIZERS LOOK BAD.
At a later stage of the media campaign for gay rights-long after other gay ads have become commonplace-it will be time
to get tough with remaining opponents. To be blunt, they must be vilified. (This will be all the more necessary because, by
that time, the entrenched enemy will have quadrupled its output of vitriol and disinformation.) Our goal is here is twofold.
First, we seek to replace the mainstream's self-righteous pride about its homophobia with shame and guilt. Second, we intend
to make the antigays look so nasty that average Americans will want to dissociate themselves from such types.
The public should be shown images of ranting homophobes whose secondary traits and beliefs disgust middle America. These
images might include: the Ku Klux Klan demanding that gays be burned alive or castrated; bigoted southern ministers drooling
with hysterical hatred to a degree that looks both comical and deranged; menacing punks, thugs, and convicts speaking coolly
about the "fags" they have killed or would like to kill; a tour of Nazi concentration camps where homosexuals were
tortured and gassed.
A campaign to vilify the victimizers is going to enrage our most fervid enemies, of course. But what else can we say?
The shoe fits, and we should make them try it on for size, with all of America watching.
 SOLICIT FUNDS: THE BUCK STOPS HERE
Any massive campaign of this kind would require unprecedented expenditures for months or even years--an unprecedented
Effective advertising is a costly proposition: several million dollars would get the ball rolling. There are 10-15 million
primarily homosexual adults in this country: if each one of them donated just two dollars to the campaign, its war chest would
actually rival that of its most vocal enemies. And because those gays not supporting families usually have more discretionary
income than average, they could afford to contribute much more.
"... We intend to make the antigays look so nasty that average Americans will want to dissociate themselves from
But would they? Or is the gay community as feckless, selfish, uncommitted, and short-sighted as its critics claim? We
will never know unless the new campaign simultaneously launches a concerted nationwide appeal for funding support from both
known and anonymous donors. The appeal should be directed both at gays and at straights who care about social justice.
In the beginning, for reasons to be explained in a moment, the appeal for funds may have to be launched exclusively through
the gay press--national magazines, local newspapers, flyers at bars, notices in glossy skin magazines. Funds could also come
through the outreach of local gay organizations on campuses and in metropolitan areas. Eventually, donations would be solicited
directly alongside advertisements in the major straight media.
There would be no parallel to such an effort in the history of the gay community in America. If it failed to generate
the needed capital to get started; there would be little hope for the campaign and l little hope for major progress toward
gay rights in the near future. For the moment let us suppose that gays could see how donations would greatly serve their long-term
interest, and that sufficient funds could be raised. An heroic assumption.
GETTING ON THE AIR, OR, YOU CAN'T GET THERE FROM HERE.
Without access to TV, radio, and the mainstream press, there will be no campaign. This is a tricky problem, became many
impresarios of the media simply refuse to accept what they call "issue-advertising" -- persuasive advertising can
provoke a storm of resentment from the public and from sponsors, which is bad for business. The courts have confirmed the
broadcaster's right to refuse any "issue advertising" he dislikes.
What exactly constitutes "issue advertising"? It evidently does not include platitudinous appeals to the virtues
of family unity (courtesy of the Mormons) neither does it include tirades against perfidious Albion courtesy of Lyndon LaRouche);
neither does it include reminders that a Mind-Is-a Terrible Thing to Waste (courtesy of the United Negro College Fund); neither
does it include religious shows which condemn gay "sinners"; neither does it include condemnations of nuclear war
or race discrimination--at least not in Massachusetts. Some guys get all the breaks.
What issue advertising does include these days is almost any communiqué presented openly by a homosexual organization.
The words "gay" and "homosexual"' are considered controversial whenever they appear.
Because most straightforward appeals are impossible, the National Gay Task Force has had to cultivate quiet backroom liaisons
with broadcast companies and newsrooms in order to make sure that issues important to the gay community receive some coverage;
but such an arrangement is hardly ideal, of course, because it means that the gay community's image is controlled by the latest
news event instead of by careful design--and recently most of the news about gays has been negative.
So what can be done to crash the gates of the major media? Several things, advanced in several stages.
START WITH THE FINE PRINT
Newspapers and magazines may very well be hungrier for gay advertising dollars than television and radio arc. And the
cost of ads in print is generally lower. But remember that the press, for the most part, is only read by better-educated Americans,
many of who are already more accepting of homosexuality in any case. So to get more impact for our dollars, we should skip
the New Republic and New Left Review readers and head for Time, People, and the National Enquirer. (Of course, the gay community
may have to establish itself as a regular advertising presence in more sophisticated forums first before it is accepted into
the mass press.)
While we're storming the battlements with salvos of ink, we should also warm the mainstream up a bit with a subtle national
campaign on highway billboards. In simple bold print on dark backgrounds, a series of unobjectionable messages should be introduced:
IN RUSSIA, THEY TELL YOU WHAT TO BE. IN AMERICA WE HAVE THE FREEDOM TO BE OURSELVES ... AND TO BE THE BEST.
PEOPLE HELPING INSTEAD OF HATING --THAT 'S WHAT AMERICA IS ALL ABOUT.
And so on. Each sign will tap patriotic sentiment, each message will drill a seemingly agreeable proposition into mainstream
heads - a "public service message" suited to our purposes. And, if their owners will permit it, each billboard will
be signed, in slightly smaller letters, "Courtesy of the National Gay Task Force" - to build positive associations
and get the public used to seeing such sponsorship.
VISUAL STAGE 1: YOU REALLY OUGHTTA BE IN PICTURES
As for television and radio, a more elaborate plan may be needed to break the ice. For openers, naturally, we must continue
to encourage the appearance of favorable gay characters in films and TV shows. Daytime talk shows also remain a useful avenue
But to speed things up we might consider a bold stratagem to gain media attention. The scheme we have in mind would require
careful preparations, yet it would save expense even while it elevated the visibility and stature of the gay movement overnight.
Well before the next elections for national office, we might lay careful plans to run symbolic gay candidates for every
high political office in this country. (Such plans would have to deal somehow with the tricky problem of inducing gays and
straights to sign enough endorsement petitions to get us on the ballot.) Our 50-250 candidates would participate in such debates
as they could, run gay-themed advertisements coordinated at our national headquarters, and demand equal time on the air. They
could then graciously pull out of the races before the actual elections, while formally endorsing more viable straight contenders.
(With malicious humor, perhaps, in some states we could endorse our most rabid opponents.) It is essential not to ask people
actually to vote Yea or Nay on the gay issue at this early stage: such action would end up committing most to the Nay position
and would only tally huge and visible defeats for our cause.
Through such a political campaign, the mainstream would get over the initial shock of seeing gay ads, and the acceptability
of such ads would be fortified by the most creditable context possible; and all this would be accomplished before non-electoral
advertising was attempted by the gay community. During the campaign all hell would break loose, but if we behaved courageously
and respectable our drive would gain legitimacy in and case and might even become a cause celebre. If all went as planned,
the somewhat desensitized public and the major networks themselves would be 'readied for the next step of our program.
VISUAL STAGE 2: PEEKABOO ADVERTISING
At this point the gay community has its foot in the door, and it is time to ask the networks to accept gay sponsorship
of certain ads and shows. Timing is critical: The request must be made immediately after our national political ads disappear.
Failing that, we should request sponsorship the next time one of the networks struts its broad-mindedness by televising a
film or show with gay characters or themes. If they wish to look consistent instead of hypocritical, we'll have them on the
But the networks would still be forced to say No unless we made their resistance look patently unreasonable, and possibly
illegal. We'd do just that by proposing "gay ads" patterned exactly after those currently sponsored by the Mormons
and others. As usual, viewers would be treated to squeak-clean skits on the importance of family harmony and understanding
--this time the narrator would end by saying, "This message was brought to you by --the National Gay Task Force."
All very quiet and subdued. Remember: exposure is everything, and the medium is the message.
"... Exposure is everything and the medium is the message."
The gay community should join forces with other civil liberties groups of respectable cast to promote bland messages about
America the Melting Pot, always ending with an explicit reference to the Task Force of some other gay organization. Making
the best of a bad situation, we can also propose sympathetic media appeals for gifts and donations to fund AIDS research--if
Jerry Lewis and the March of Dimes can do it, so can we. Our next indirect step will be to advertise locally on behalf of
support groups peripheral to the gay community: frowzy straight moms and dads announcing phone numbers and meeting times for
"Parents of Gays" or similar gatherings. Can't you just see such ads now, presented between messages from the Disabled
Vets and the Postal Workers Union?
VISUAL STAGE 3: ROLL OUT THE BIG GUNS
By this point, our salami tactics will have carved out, slice by slice, a large portion of access to the mainstream media.
So what then? It would finally be time to bring gay ads out of the closet. The messages of such ads should directly address
lingering public fears about homosexuals as loathsome and contrary aliens. For examples, the following are possible formats
for TV or radio commercials designed to chip away at chronic misperceptions.
Format A for Familiarization: The Testimonial.
To make gays seem less mysterious, present a series of short spots featuring the boy-or girl-next-door, fresh and appealing,
or warm and lovable grandma grandpa types. Seated in homey surroundings, they respond to an off camera interviewer with assurance,
good nature, and charm. Their comments bring out three social facts:
1. There is someone special in their life, a long-term relationship (to stress gay stability, monogamy, commitment);
2. Their families are very important to them, and are supportive of them (to stress that gays are not "anti-family,"
and that families need not be anti-gay.)
3. As far as they can remember they have always been gay, and were probably born gay; they certainly never decided on
a preference one way or the other (stressing that gays are doing what is natural for them, and are not being willfully contrary).
The subjects should be interviewed alone, not with their lovers or children, for to include others in the picture would unwisely
raise disturbing questions about the complexities of gay social relations, which these commercials could not explain. It is
best instead to take one thing at a time.
Format B for Positive associations: The Celebrity Spot.
While it might be useful to present celebrity endorsements by currently popular gay figures and straight sympathizers
(Johnny Mathis? Marlo Thomas?), the homophobia climate of America would make such brash endorsements unlikely in the near
future. So early celebrity spots will instead identify historical gay or bisexual personalities who are illustrious and dignified...and
dead. The ads could be sardonic and indirect. For example, over regal music and a portrait or two, a narrator might announce
simply: Michelangelo (an art class), Tchaikovsky (a music class), Tennessee Williams (a drama class), etc.
Format C for Victim Sympathy: Our Campaign to Stop Child Abuse.
As we said earlier, there are many ways to portray gays as victims of discrimination: images of brutality, tales of job
loss and family separation, and so on. But we think something like the following 30-sccond commercials would get to the heart
of the matter best of all.
The camera slowly moves in on a middle-class teenager, sitting alone in his semi-darkened bedroom. The boy is pleasing
and unexceptional in appearance, except that he has been roughed up and is staring silently, pensively, with evident distress.
As the camera gradually focuses in on his face, a narrator comments: It will happen to one in every ten sons. As he grows
up he will realize that he feels differently about things than most of his friends. If he lets it show, he'll be an outsider
made fun of, humiliated, attacked. If he confides in his parents, they may throw him out of the house, onto the streets. Some
will say he is "anti-family." Nobody will let him be himself. So he will have to hide. From his friends, his family.
And that's hard. It's tough enough to be a kid these days, but to be the one in ten... A message from the National Gay Task
What is nice about such an ad is that it would economically portray gays as innocent and vulnerable, victimized and misunderstood,
surprisingly numerous yet not menacing. It also renders the "anti-family" charge absurd and hypocritical.
Format D for Identification with Victims: The Old Switcheroo.
The mainstream will identify better with the plight of gays if straights can, once in a while, walk a mile in gay shoes.
A humorous television or radio ad to help them do this might involve a brief animated or dramatized scenario, as follows.
The camera approaches the mighty oak door of the boss's office, which swings open, and the camera (which represents you
the viewer) enters the room. Behind the oversized desk sits a fat and scowling old curmudgeon chomping on a cigar. He looks
up at the camera (i.e. at the viewer) and snarls, " So it's you, Smithers. Well you're fired!" The voice of a younger
man is heard to reply with astonishment, "But--but--Mr. Thomburg, I've been with your company for ten years. I thought
you liked my work." The boss responds, with a tone of disgust, "Yes, yes, Smithers your work is quite adequate.
But I've heard rumors that you've been seen around town with some kind of girlfriend. A girlfriend! Frankly I'm shocked. We're
not about to start hiring any heterosexuals in this company. Now get out." The younger man speaks once more: "But
boss, that's just not fair! What if it were you?" The boss glowers back as the camera pulls quickly out of the room and
the big door slams shut. Printed on the door: "A message from the National Gay Task Force."
One can easily imagine similar episodes involving housing or other discrimination.
Format E for Vilification of Victimizers: Damn the Torpedoes.
We have already indicated some of the images which might be damaging to the homophobic vendetta: ranting and hateful religious
extremists neo-Nazis, and Ku Klux Klansmen made to look evil and ridiculous (hardly a difficult task).
These images should be combined with those of their gay victims by a method propagandists call the "bracket technique."
For example, for a few seconds an unctuous beady-eyed Southern preacher is seen pounding the pulpit in rage about "those
sick, abominable creatures." While his tirade continues over the soundtrack, the picture switches to pathetic photos
of gays who look decent, harmless, and likable; and then we cut back to the poisonous face of the preacher, and so forth.
The contrast speaks for itself. The effect is devastating.
"...it would portray gays as innocent and vulnerable, victimized and misunderstood, surprisingly numerous, yet not
Format F for Funds: SOS
Alongside or during these other persuasive advertisements, we would have to solicit donations so that the campaign might
continue. Direct appeals from celebrities (preferable living ones, thank you) might be useful here. All appeals must stress
that money can be given anonymously (e.g. via money orders) and that all donations are confidential. "We can't help unless
you help," and all that.
The Time Is Now
We have sketched out here a blueprint for transforming the social values of straight America. At the core of our program
is a media campaign to change the way the average citizens view homosexuality. It is quite easy to find fault with such a
campaign. We have tried to be practical and specific here, but the proposals may still have a visionary sheen.
There are one hundred reasons why the campaign could not be done or would be risky. But there are at least 20 million
good reasons why some such program must be tried in the coming years: the welfare and happiness of every gay man and woman
in this country demand it. As the last large, legally oppressed minority in American society, it is high time that gays took
effective measures to rejoin the mainstream in pride and strength. We believe that, like it or not, such a campaign is the
only way of doing so anytime soon.
And, let us repeat, time may be running out. The AIDS epidemic is sparking anger and fear in the heartland of straight
America. As the virus leaks out of homosexual circles and into the rest of society, we need have no illusions about who is
receiving the blame. The ten years ahead may decide for the next forty whether gays claim their liberty and equality or are
driven back, once again, as America's caste of detested untouchables. It's more than a quip: speak now or forever hold your
[Keep in mind this article was published in 1987. Since that time homosexual activists have made remarkable progress in
their media campaign. With over 25 openly "gay" characters on TV shows such as, Roseanne, Melrose Place, Picket
Fences, Northern Exposure, Ellen, Dawson's Creek, Will and Grace, etc. where homosexuality is presented as normal, natural
behavior on a regular basis. NBC News did a three-day series on "Gays in America" in September that had no opposing
view, other than one brief statement by Dr. Paul Cameron. There 's a proliferation of "gay" propaganda being shoved
down our throats in movies like "The Crying Game", "Philadelphia", "Priscilla, Queen of the Desert",
"Go Fish", and many more.
"... Hollywood is coming out of the closet and homosexual activists are jumping up and down for joy."
Hollywood is indeed coming, out of the closet, and homosexual activists are jumping up and down for joy. Why? Because
they know Americans flock to the movie theaters in droves, and that gradually the message of accepting homosexuality as a
normal variant of human sexuality is getting through to people-minds are being changed.
For those of you who want to investigate more about the homosexual agenda and various strategies I recommend the book
After the Ball by Kirk and Madsen. (Check your library first; I hate to see these guys make money to support their cause.)
Both authors are Harvard grads--Kirk is a researcher in neuropsychiatry, while Madsen is "an expert on public persuasion
tactics and social marketing." The book is an expansion of the above article complete with sample print ads to use, as
well as suggestions for radio, TV spots.]
This article is taken from the following website: http://www.sphi.com/the_gay_agenda.htm